Prompting as clear communication
Goal, context, constraints, format — iteration over magic prompts.
Good prompting is less spellcasting and more clear communication. You’re briefing a fast, literal collaborator that doesn’t share your unspoken context.
Clarity beats cleverness: say the job, give context, set limits, ask for a shape.
A simple template
- Goal — What do you want done? (“Draft a 3-bullet summary for a non-technical reader.”)
- Context — What does the model need to know? (Audience, background, source text.)
- Constraints — Limits: length, tone, must/avoid, reading level.
- Format — How should the answer look? (Bullets, table, email, JSON-ish structure.)
You don’t need all four every time. Start with goal + format; add context when results miss.
Few-shot, lightly
Showing one or two examples of the shape you want often works better than abstract instructions. Keep examples short.
Iterate
First answers are drafts. Refine: “Shorter.” “More skeptical.” “Only use facts from the text I pasted.” Iteration beats hunting for a mythical perfect one-liner.
Next
When you’re ready for reusable patterns and fuller examples, continue to Prompt engineering in practice.
Takeaway
Prompting skill is briefing skill. Clarity beats cleverness.
Rewrite a vague ask (“help with my resume”) into goal + context + constraints + format. Run both versions and compare which output you’d actually use.